Renato Iannella comments

Results 87 comments of


                                            Renato Iannella

On a odrl:refinement over an Action / Asset Collection / Party Collection

Seems to work fine when I load into GraphDB

On a odrl:refinement over an Action / Asset Collection / Party Collection

And the SPARQL

On a odrl:refinement over an Action / Asset Collection / Party Collection

``` ex:someCatalog rdf:type odrl:Asset, odrl:AssetCollection . ex:policy01 rdf:type odrl:Offer ; rdfs:label "Policy 01" ; odrl:permission ex:perm01, ex:perm02 ; odrl:prohibition ex:prohib01 . ex:perm01 rdf:type odrl:Permission ; rdfs:label "Permission 01" ; odrl:action...

policies for creators/publishers

Another option would be a policy that was an Obligation (assignee = asset owner) and the action could be ex:conform with a refinement of ex:conformanceRule = "URI"

policies for creators/publishers

I can understand why "use" would not really directly cover conformance, as it was intended as types of actions to perform with the asset. Perhaps we do need a new...

policies for creators/publishers

The options are: 1) You define your own ODRL Profile - including a new top-level Action (eg manage). 2) You accept that "use" (in the context of a dataset publisher)...

RDF Triple included twice in the ontology.

Thanks @vroddon Can you be more specific on 3)? Which comments should be removed?