Renato Iannella
Renato Iannella
Hi @joshcornejo Figure 2 maps directly and consistently from the Model in Figure 1 . In your proposal, it implies there is a "refinement" property between Rule and PartyCollection.
Hi @joshcornejo .. I want to conclude this ticket...but I need to clarify what the actual "errata" is. From the original request (see above)...is the issue that Figure 2 is...
As per the decision here: https://github.com/w3c/odrl/blob/master/meetings/2025/meeting-2025-06-09.md this issue is closed
Protege 5.6.4 MacOSX Tried all Reasoners... Configure below.
Can you use `rightOperandReference` ? https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-model/#constraint-class
Yes...add more examples !!!
When you transform Example 14 to turtle, you would get: ``` a odrl:Offer ; odrl:profile ; odrl:assigner ; odrl:target ; odrl:permission [ odrl:action [ rdf:value odrl:print ; odrl:refinement [ odrl:leftOperand...
I think the rdf:value properties should be odrl:source properties.
When you say: `odrl:target ex:URI_23244A; //
A refinement is a type of odrl:Constraint (or odrl:LogicalConstraint) So you can create an instance of the refinement, then only refer to it in the Permission. Like: ``` ex:someCatalog rdf:type...