rhugman

Thank you @incsanchezro and @codyalbertross for your time and effort on the reviews. We have addressed your comments and updated the repo and paper in the `jose-review` branch. I will...

Hi @kls2177, We have updated the repo in the [ `jose-review`](https://github.com/gmdsi/GMDSI_notebooks/tree/jose-review) branch addressing @incsanchezro and @codyalbertross comments. We are not clear on what the next steps are, can you please...

Hi @kls2177 , @incsanchezro and @codyalbertross, Any update on the response to revisions? Cheers, -R

Hi @kls2177, thanks for expediting this. We responded to comments by @incsanchezro directly in the issues they raised (linked below): > 1. > > [JOSE Review - comments on "Self-Guided...

Thanks @kls2177, > 1. The JOSE paper is over the [suggested word limit of 1000 words](https://openjournals.readthedocs.io/en/jose/submitting.html#:~:text=Expected%20length%20is%20around%201000%20words%20max.). I encourage the authors to revise and shorten this paper. Some of my suggestions...

Hi @kls2177, as I mentioned in the previous post, that website was out of date and not intended as part of this submission. (Thank you for bringing to our attention...

> Thanks for the clarification @rhugman. I had been looking at the website. > > Thank you for revising the paper. I apologize for this, but I think it would...

> Thanks @rhugman! The next step in the publication process will to make sure that your archive doi is current. I see that you have the following [archive](https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/631a06b1d34e36012efa64ad). Please be...

A workaround is to apply such rules using the 'modflowapi'.