rht
I see, it's a relief knowing the cause. > The appropriate solution to this likely involves passing the buffer qsim uses in its C++ layer up to the python level...
NVM, that was a digression comment specific to my use case. Though I was mistaken that the issue in that comment is related to #601, because the cuQuantum Appliance would...
I see. > It's not really recommended to use simulate for shallow circuits on GPUs. I believe the OOM issue on a2-highgpu-1g happens even on deep circuits, because of the...
I tried commenting out the `state_vector = state_vector.copy()` line, and no more OOM, yay! However, is it safe to do so? My assumption is that `_BufferedStatevector` new allocation of a...
I can reproduce the error with a simpler example: ```python backend = Aer.get_backend("statevector_simulator") qc = QuantumCircuit(2) qc.h(0) qc.ch(1, 0) result = execute(qc, backend).result() s_ = result.get_statevector(qc, decimals=2) print(s_) qc =...
I confirm it is still an issue, even on the `qiskit_aer` module that has been separated from `qiskit`. I think it would be easier to transfer the issue instead, so...
Hmmm...Looks like this hasn't been spec-ed / exists only in the viz example. There are two means to put this: 1. do a regex match on the remaining issues that...
> I think we want a regexp looking for ‘related to: …’ syntax, because > that will let you declare relations consistently regardless of whether > the relative is on...
The benchmark plot needs to be updated to the 23.06 one: https://github.com/NVIDIA/cuQuantum/discussions/53#discussioncomment-6474186.