RH Becker

@moelasmar Please consider changing this issue's label from `type/feature` to `type/bug`. The language used on [SAM's main marketing page](https://aws.amazon.com/serverless/aws-sam/), under the `Why SAM?` header, reinforces what several participants have asserted...

I like this idea, but until something like that is supported, you could potentially create log and subscription resources from the same [Collection parameter](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/intrinsic-function-reference-foreach.html#intrinsic-function-reference-foreach-parameters), in [a single Fn::ForEach loop](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/intrinsic-function-reference-foreach-example-resource.html#intrinsic-function-reference-foreach-example-replicate-multiple-resources). **EDIT:**...

> My concern about using a collection was that I might miss the name of a Lambda resource or perhaps typo the name (the latter would probably fail fast). I...

I've updated to 2.3.9 (appears to be the latest) and this issue persists. I'm not on the developer version of Brackets. I did try updating Brackets to the latest: Release...

Oh, and as far as I know, I'm not able to reopen an issue you've closed. I assume these replies are sufficient.

I'm trying to use the [StringFunctions](https://github.com/aws-cloudformation/aws-cloudformation-macros/tree/master/StringFunctions) macro within a `Fn::ForEach` loop, with the macro's `InputString` referencing the function's `Identifier`. During changeset creation, I see an error ... > Failed to...

I'm assessing whether apprunner would be a suitable option for the compute layer of a highly scalable WordPress implementation. Considering the [reference architecture] specified in your _Best Practices for WordPress...

Other than "Scale to zero", this appears to be the most 👍'ed issue to not yet make the Roadmap. Is there any chance the team could weigh in on whether...

@hiebj Just above your comment, there's an auto-generated notification indicating this issue was moved into the "We are working on it" column of the service's Roadmap - so, I think...

Is this need not satisfied via WAF web ACLs? I realize this issue is about using Security Groups, but the original poster's requirement is stated as ... > My Requirement...