Jonathan Revusky

JavaCC 21 is not currently on Maven Central. That is on my TODO list but has kind of fallen through the cracks. So far... The project is rather undermanned right...

> mostly works... :) I don't know whether you're aware of this (maybe you are aware of it, but your comment shows no awareness of it...) but the `CommonTokenAction` disposition...

Hi Andreas. For a variety of reasons, I am a bit reluctant to weigh in on these things, because finally, what I can I say? People just have to figure...

> Both versions could not live at the same time. You might consider this: https://javacc.com/2021/02/01/javacc-21-has-a-preprocessor/ #if support_nested_comments .... #else ... #endif

> In my limited understanding, all these challenges have one common denominator: they happen on Token Definition Level, where Java CC does not provide any support for configuration or flexibility....

> It looks very useful, if we can ACTIVATE/DEACTIVATE based on a condition. It looks very useful, if we can ACTIVATE/DEACTIVATE based on a condition. Well, yeah, it works. You...

See: https://javacc.com/2021/06/13/activating-de-activating-tokens/

Yesterday I had a bit of insomnia and was actually looking at your bsh.jjt file. It requires more adjustment than I would have thought. The biggest single problem that you...

> I believe the support is now JAVA 19, correct me if I am wrong, updated since this documentation was written. I think the only unsupported Java constructs are still...

> Ahh good, so it will be possible to "overwrite" or change the things from the included grammar? Maybe that's wishful thinking... No, that's not wishful thinking at all! You...