reuther-genisys
reuther-genisys
> To start with, can you just merge `develop` in (or rebase)? Thanks. I thought I would be able to with one button click, but seems I can't. Done.
The current approach breaks for all algorithms where a graph is recursively split into smaller subgraphs. My application is the decomposition of a cycle-free graph into a complete set of...
> When we call `ComponentDecomposition()` that's called on **A**, and so `component` is a list of _a_. Then at the top of the loop, we call **A**.create_subgraph(_a_), yielding a **B**...
Is there an update to this issue?
Jup. It's a one-liner.
While documenting the current behavior is a good thing, I feel that as a solution it does not go far enough. It simply nonsensical that the `create_subgraph` method requires vertex...
I understand your point: Silent behavior changes are dangerous. In this case, however, I still hold the current behavior to be a genuine bug that should be fixed: It runs...