content icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
content copied to clipboard

Tools ecosystem processes

Open hmenager opened this issue 4 years ago • 4 comments

This table is meant to document the various processes (workflows) taking place in this repository:

Source name Import Validation Cross-link Report Publish
bio.tools biotools-import.yaml biotools-testrunregistry.yml doi-load.yaml biotools-pullrequest-analyzer.yml bioschemas-build.yml bioschemas-build-dump.yml
bioconda bioconda-import.yaml
biocontainers push from biocontainers
OpenEBench metrics openebench-git-populous
Debian Med debianmed-import.yml debian-yaml-validator.yaml doi-load.yaml
BIII biii-import.yaml biii-import.yaml
Global report.yaml

hmenager avatar Oct 21 '20 16:10 hmenager

@OlegZharkov @bgruening can you provide the bioconda + biocontainers information?

hmenager avatar Oct 21 '20 16:10 hmenager

@redmitry from what I understand openebench-git-populous only sends the metrics data. Do you have another script to send the openebench data themselves?

hmenager avatar Oct 22 '20 06:10 hmenager

@redmitry from what I understand openebench-git-populous only sends the metrics data. Do you have another script to send the openebench data themselves? No. The reason is that OpenEBench tools collected from bio.tools, bioconda and some time ago galaxy. That would be a duplication (?).
I have a code to import bio.tool -> git:
https://gitlab.bsc.es/inb/elixir/tools-platform/biotools-git-populous

There is no problem to push OpenEBench tools to the github, but its update supposed to be done on the over direction (from conda/biotools files).

Cheers,

D.

redmitry avatar Oct 22 '20 07:10 redmitry

Thanks for the clarification @redmitry. Indeed, if you have no other source for metadata than bio.tools and bioconda, then there is probably no need to document what is probably a "one-time" import.

hmenager avatar Oct 22 '20 18:10 hmenager