Yevhen Sidelnyk
Yevhen Sidelnyk
Hope this will be merged at some point
Hi, @beberlei , Thank you for all the effort made during doctrine orm development. This is indeed powerful tool used by millions, yet sometimes people do not fully understand the...
Have never seen anything like this before. Is it necessary?
You can reopen it and submit the PR on yourself.
I wonder why couldn't we allow `shouldBeNamed` to work with full classname (including namespace) rather than class basename? Currently shouldBeNamed applied to Foo\Bar class checks only Bar part (rather than...
Thank you @carlosas , it's a great deal what you are doing! It's such a pleasure to use a tool like this! It truly allows us to enforce very specific...
Hi @oleg-andreyev , Thanks for submitting this issue. I myself has stumbled across it few times. @Ocramius , what do you think about it?
@Ocramius , who could help us with this? Is there anyone responsible for merge requests review or any other kind of feedback (even if it is just closing the MR)?...
@greg0ire , what do you think about this? :point_up: I think there are no reasons for keeping that `match(true)` any longer and IMO using visitor's double dispatch approach would be...
@ghostwriter , I also faced this same issue when using psalm. From my side, the solution was moving it into `vendor-bin` (by means of composer bin plugin) and installing it...