redoomed1

Are you accepting suggestions/contributions for this PR? If so, I'm happy to help draft/write this guide as I have some time on my hands. As @kimg45 noted, Vanadium has had...

> This is consistent with how we handle ordering based on platform availability and popularity across the site. Makes sense, I appreciate all the reasoning you gave. > have the...

> I think if we add an additional category to this page we should come up with criteria for it. Are you still thinking about doing this? I think that...

> The intention was to put this in it's own language section. This tool can be self hosted, and the content was going to be advising that this could be...

Thanks for observing this issue, @lamtrinhdev ! I think the behavior of the popup here bears some similarity to the one I noted in this comment: https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/pull/2451#issuecomment-2037930893 > I think...

Behavior was fixed with #2594 

> * Warning about Brave's Google Play Services dependency Please see the following update: https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/latest-brave-for-android-has-a-hard-dependency-on-google-play-services-microg/18085/30

> Those policies don't make much sense to enable unless you're using or planning to use Bitlocker, anyway. On further reflection, I agree. On that note, I recently reviewed the...

This wasn't approved to be added to the site. You can go on the [forum](https://discuss.privacyguides.net/) and start a discussion about it to request it to be added.

The new sections display weirdly on Mullvad Browser and Tor Browser (Safer _and_ Standard security levels).   Otherwise, they look great on other browsers! (Tested in Firefox+Arkenfox and Vanadium,...