red031000
red031000
I did also say in my comment that I would be happy with an alternative change, which corvid helpfully clarified that you also stated, I appear to have mis-interpreted that,...
while that is true, it is still a very powerful command that is (potentially) open to abuse, and imo should be for the most trusted group only to mitigate that...
while it is true users are restricted to lower or the same access level and abuse of powers can't really happen, I can see mis-attribution of commands happening, with commands...
I suppose that is true, I still would like it to be SuperUser however, as that was the original intention
personally I feel that tweaks should give way to TP whenever there's a conflict, as it makes it easier to add TP specific features in TP, rather than having tweaks...
that's fair, but if that's the case, I believe that tweaks should be listed as a dependency for TP if it's going to completely replacce the UI system, as TP...
while I do see the advantages of not having code duplications etc, I can't help but feel that this will make it harder to maintain the elements that are moved...
sometimes it is necessary to have the typedef and struct definition separately, usually when the structs contain pointers to eachother, in that case the de facto standard is the following...
as for unions, imo they should follow the same rules as structs
generally I don't think you should really be passing unions around by themselves, all unions should be within a struct, even if it is the only thing in the struct...