Mr. Walls
🤷🏻 Caveat: I should start by disclaiming any expertise on the security details, including for mp4 files. Let's say I'm also a curious bystander... 🤔 I see a few parts...
so a quick look at the code shows part (if not most ... or even all) or this hardlink issue is here: https://github.com/laurent22/rsync-time-backup/blob/88db869fe7a52864e18afc7e16a971499f79e830/rsync_tmbackup.sh#L391 and the hardcoded values: https://github.com/laurent22/rsync-time-backup/blob/88db869fe7a52864e18afc7e16a971499f79e830/rsync_tmbackup.sh#L282 This is...
I have a hunch this is related to how the script is written to handle recursion and the way you _seem_ to think of a directory as one exclusion. _hint:...
@fthiery > but some stuff is impossible to simulate unfortunately (e.g. #64) [TL;DR](https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/tldr-meaning-acronym/) I think you're missing an important "easily" between "to" and "simulate. With that assumption it might be...
Oh this looks fun ... I'll see about hacking out a test script for these if no one else is working on it 🤔 ... um ... but first ......
I think this calls for some CI testing (🎉 _I'm so excited_) ## So that it's documented somewhere: CI Testing is great for ensuring code works and changes don't introduce...
😥 No one stopped me before I got to starting on this issue .... 🤓 SO I prepared a PR #205 for testing ... reviews welcome!
example test run with both failures and success: https://github.com/reactive-firewall/rsync-time-backup/actions/runs/59351995 now to comment out the fail and fix CI to pass ...
OK example test run again with passing results available: https://github.com/reactive-firewall/rsync-time-backup/runs/521078766 This is how it will look once merged into master
Oh I like the ext4 `/lost+found/` example ... this seems related to #181 if only slightly