Rónán Carrigan

Glad you're enjoying the plugin! I don't think this would be possible right now as that'd require overriding the `echo`/`echom` commands (possibly others) which AFAIK is not possible right now...

I'm not opposed to the idea but also not sure how it would look. Would it only be for failures? If not then I'd imagine it would get quite noisy....

With the release of https://github.com/rcarriga/neotest, I'm going to consider this a feature request for the repo as I'll not really be contributing more to vim-ultest myself except for bug fixes....

Hmm yep I can see how that's a bit of a hiccup as you put it :sweat_smile: That definitely breaks a lot of assumptions in vim-test and vim-ultest. Are the...

As an initial step I think it'd be fairly trivial to add the ability to run individual tests and files. You would just need to write a custom vim-test runner...

> I have an idea on how I could possibly do it (possibly having a regexp for the test, that picks up the namespace + test at the same time...

In case you hadn't seen it I've released the new plugin https://github.com/rcarriga/neotest. There's no GTest integration but if someone wanted to add support for it, I'd be happy to help...

Yep I've thought about this before but I do not develop on windows and do not have the time to get setup and be able to test. I'd certainly be...

If you are using NeoVim I'd recommend checking out my new plugin https://github.com/rcarriga/neotest which is a successor to vim-ultest. It *should* support windows (if not let me know in an...

So yes as the docs says ultest needs to be able to parse the output of the test runner to run the tests together. Otherwise tests must be run separately...