Ron Buckton

> I like this idea, but it is ambiguous when we should use BooleanValue and when we should use a boolean. There are a few other functions that return `boolean`...

This may be addressed by #465, but probably only as a follow-on to this proposal as this proposal is already at Stage 3. > I understand the reasoning, but this...

> @rbuckton Actually, we can retrieve the class name from the decorated method. Here's a demonstration: [...] That would give you the class name of the instance constructor, not the...

> - If you could "decorate" any export, what would you expect to be able to do? Some possible use cases (obviously not exhaustive): 1. Rename the exported symbol. 1....

@doodadjs can you explain what you mean by "specific to the language, and non-expendable"?

> Decorating exports seems to have a lot of the same questions around hoisting as decorating function declarations. When would the decorator on an export actually run? Decorators _must_ be...

>> can you explain what you mean by "specific to the language, and non-expendable"? > > I mean just a closed set of them should exist, like other keywords in...

> There should be the concept of packages... [...] I'm not exactly certain I see how this applies to this topic. While "packages" are certainly a JS developer community concept,...

> Cannot some @decorators be better provided by the runtime ? I'm not opposed to the runtime providing decorators, and in fact encourage it. However, it would be much easier...

@littledan: While I can understand tagging this as a "follow-on proposal", I feel we _must_ explore this in some fashion before we can truly make a determination on #69, given...