rbsec

FYI, the copyright for any code contributed by third parties is still owned by them, and that code has been included in this project under the GPLv3 license. Because of...

As with both of you guys, IANAL, but there there have been a number of different discussions of this in the past (such as [here](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9122969/change-open-source-license-of-my-own-software) and [here](http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/173193/open-source-library-can-the-project-owner-change-the-license-to-be-more-restric)) which invariably come...

@magnumripper apologies - I've deleted my comment from the other thread - thanks for moving it here. Truncating the hashes to 32 bytes seems to work fine, and I'm having...

If you use the `-q` option the then the output file only includes the discovered IPs and hostnames separated by a spaces and hyphens (so you can just extra whichever...

One reason that they might be different is that the version of OpenSSL you're using may not support all of the protocols or ciphers that sslscan does (for example, older...

I was scanning a FortiWeb appliance that was returning [unrecognized_name](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446#section-6.2) (code 112) response on the admin interface. It did this regardless of whether I used the proper hostname or IP...

Hi @drakylar, This isn't actually a bug. The recursive scanning is intentionally run even when a wildcard is present, because a wildcard record doesn't meant that there are no other...

@drakylar you can set the max recursion depth with `-m` or `--maxdepth`, which should stop it getting stuck for ever. Would that solve your issue?

I'm not really clear what false positives you're seeing. So if you scan `example.org`, and it has a wildcard domain, that gets flagged. Is the issue that if it has...

Ah, I understand where you're coming from. While I don't think it's technically incorrect to recursively scan a domain that we know has wildcards (as there's nothing stopping it also...