rbiasini

@msalau , thanks, I agree that dbc files should be changed to follow a standard. It's not high priority for us to fix it now, but fell free to open...

Quite invasive and probably not the highest priority. Shouldn't be rushed before other SIL2 tasks are done.

Quite invasive and probably not the highest priority. Shouldn't be rushed before other SIL2 tasks are done.

The current coverage only applies to rules and it's summarized here: https://github.com/commaai/panda/blob/master/tests/misra/coverage_table Dir 4.6 is also advisory. Still, we will probably adopt it in the future.

Nice :) Is there anything wrong with the way that extended IDs are defined? What would trigger this? `Standard frame id 0x40830635 is more than 11 bits in message IDT1S04_83`