Razvan Deaconescu

Results 168 comments of Razvan Deaconescu

This is good. Thanks, @kubanrob . @StefanJum , please add your approval + your `...-by` message and I will then finalize the approval for this.

I found the root-case of the issue. I will submit a PR.

@michpappas , agree to your point of view. Let's add this as a discussion item for the near future. I added issue #389 to discuss this.

@StefanJum , @marcrittinghaus , I think it's a simple PR and it makes sense to have it part of 0.10. @dragosargint , could you please do a review?

Hi, @MatiasVara , thanks for this. Please state in the commit message and in the PR description the reason for this revert. Is it fixing a warning or is it...

@MatiasVara , yes, that I get. But what is the main reason behind this. Do you get a build warning otherwise?

Hi, @PabloPessolani , did you follow [these instructions](https://usoc21.unikraft.org/docs/sessions/01-baby-steps/#00-manual-kraft-installation)? Did you use `kraft list update`? Did you generate a GitHub token and did you use the `UK_KRAFT_GITHUB_TOKEN` variable?

@vladandrew , could you please rebase this?

> @razvand this PR should be moved to the next release, we have to get #603 in first. Done. Moved to 0.12.

Hi, @marcrittinghaus , great comments. This is a very first community discussion on the topic. So every point should be considered. Nothing is set in stone. The aim is to...