Raza Jafri
Raza Jafri
+1 This is still a valid issue I was trying it with a label that has paranthesis
@amahussein I am not seeing the `old message` when I run the given script against Spark 3.3.2, instead I see the `new message`. In addition to that, all the overflow...
Should be closed by #6066 @jlowe can you confirm that I am not missing something you needed here?
@archenroot have you started work on the presets for cudf? I started reading about JavaCPP and it seems like I need a list of headers in order of precedence. Is...
@archenroot I am a contributor on rapids java bindings and the reason why I reached out is so I could evaluate javacpp. Please let me know if you have done...
@saudet thanks for the detailed explanation. cudf doesn't directly expose any Arrow APIs that I know of. Do we still need to provide Java presets for it? Can it not...
We are not testing for this. I saw this while working on adding tests for #10518. I can create a test for this and add to this issue.
[Here](https://github.com/NVIDIA/spark-rapids/blob/526663c8596c73fd426387343e29b3e7b51f2404/sql-plugin/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/rapids/GpuInMemoryTableScanExec.scala#L72) is the code I am referring to, we can see that we are passing the parameters without converting them to the GPU versions. I think this is not OK...
> Please add a better description stating exactly what this adds, how a user would use it, and why its being added. > > What are Working logs? Thanks for...
@tgravescs @gerashegalov PTAL