Ravi Suhag
Ravi Suhag
@singhvikash11 +1, we plan to remove Gorm. So salt/db package will be used for this. If any of the missing setting is not there then lets raise PR for that...
@bsushmith @rahmatrhd is this duplicate of #218?
Covered in #218
@rahmatrhd will both of these statuses live in access objects? If yes, we will have three fields to be tracked? ``` grant: policy/import active_in_provider/provider_status: true/false active_in_policy/policy_status: true/false ```
And all these statuses are at access object or status is on appeal?
@yz-chime In addition to ref @lavkesh provided inlining configs. 1. Using this config ``` SCHEMA_REGISTRY_STENCIL_ENABLE : false ``` 2. Yes 3. Yes (https://github.com/odpf/dagger/blob/main/docs/docs/guides/deployment.md)
@ishanarya0 CI is failing because of code coverage. Can you check this?
@StewartJingga I think the second approach is better.
Yes, this makes it confusing for sure. One way could be to rename compass related timestamp to ingestedAt etc. Or you think first approach is better? The only problem i...
Some of these validations can also happen at GRPC api layer as well.