S Rasswanth
S Rasswanth
Hi @Rene36 , could you try with the latest 0.6.0 branch and post regarding the status of the error.
Sure , I will take a look at it.
I am not sure, Did you try the opemined.org website, I think it has the invite link.
> > I am not sure, Did you try the opemined.org website, I think it has the invite link. > > It's not working I saw an issue in opened...
@shubhank-saxena , is the `github.head_ref` issue fixed? , where only it allows single workflow to be run ,as it would be good to have it PR independent.
I think `github.base_ref` won't work ,as it points to the target branch of the pull request.Could you take a look at this documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/context-and-expression-syntax-for-github-actions , I think `github.ref` would work....
I viewed your forked branch, Could you test by merging your concurrency PR to your main branch and then creating two dummy PR's to check if they are running concurrently.I...
Yes @gmuraru , we should make the workflow cancellation PR independent, that part is remaining.
@shubhank-saxena ,I viewed your dummy pull requests in your repo, The workflow are being cancelled for separate PR's, I also tested it in my repo, I think we should try...
No issues @shubhank-saxena :+1: ,I think `github.job` might work, not completely sure.