Ramesh Reddy

These are changes I would like to propose https://github.com/rareddy/postgresql-container/commit/0cb928999f3858f3d1d4e4696d13cbf019d5158e "service-port" and "service-type", may seem verbose but for an application, it takes out the guesswork to determine them and be explicit.

An updated proposal here which goes into bit more details https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T3KfOqIfJohp0s1koQ2XrJJQQhj7TECO-m2xPsW59_c/edit?usp=sharing

> Related to [kubeflow/pipelines#4790](https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/issues/4790) and yes a global instance with strict user isolation and authetication is essential for Kubeflow. This is one of the issues we are planning to tackle...

The official proposal in the form of PR https://github.com/kubeflow/community/pull/682

@juliusvonkohout would you be able to collaborate with us either in contribution or spec design for the Model Registry?

@rchincha thank you for reaching out see this about oci reference in the proposal https://github.com/kubeflow/community/pull/682/files#diff-aaf54745ecb36016135c83a5a41a03025574ecb492aec56ef6d2c7c902abfe17R180 Can I recommend you open another PR in the model registry and can we collaborate...

> Also folks over at CNCF artifacts, ORAS and OCI would certainly be interested. @rchincha we are collaborating with ORAS maintainers and model-car initiative inventors let's see we can bring...

@thesuperzapper we are hoping to pick up community contributors with this effort. Since we are not an existing project and a new effort we do not have additional contributors other...

@zijianjoy should I also add the owners of the repo as members at the beginning of the file in 1? or not needed?

1) https://github.com/kubeflow/internal-acls/pull/642 2) model-registry 3) [Apache 2.0](https://spdx.org/licenses/#:~:text=Apache%20License%202.0-,Apache%2D2.0,-Y) `edit: updated to reflect spdx database name` OWNERS ``` approvers: - andreyvelich - dhirajsb - tarilabs - Tomcli reviewers: - andreyvelich - ckadner...