Raphael Sulzer

@ahojnnes Eigen 3.3.4

Indeed it seems like vedo 2022 broke something around mesh textures. I can load a mesh texture with the sample code above in vedo 2021.0.3 correctly, but not in vedo...

Hi, I experience the following behaviour on MacOS and Ubuntu 18.04, python 3.8 / 3.9, vedo installed with conda: with this code: ```import vedo vedo.settings.useDepthPeeling = True mesh = vedo.Mesh("mesh.obj",...

Very strange, with your files it works well with both versions. I attached the same minimal example with the bunny file, the problem persists. The only difference I see is...

Hi, I have a similar issue: I have a mesh with custom data per face, stored in mesh.celldata["mydata"] I now iteratively collapse edges of the mesh and call mesh.clean() after...

> @raphaelsulzer I hope this can help addressing your case! As you mentioned in the previous issue #1007, the newest version of vedo is able to preserve/update point and celldata...

Thanks for the reply. I really have no experience with sage. I guess finding adjacencies has to be done via the graph, because the cell complex is only a list...

In fact, there seems to be a bigger problem with the cell complex. When running the solution I present above I cannot manage to merge all the duplicate vertices. Even...

For the example I attached above I kept the exact type from SAGE by using `dtype=object` in the numpy arrays. The function for producing that output is here: https://github.com/raphaelsulzer/abspy/blob/64d41e3c2d541d0c648da54afccf235831ee4947/abspy/graph.py#L222

You are right that it is probably better to write `pset == p` to respect the order of dimensions (or even `np.equal(pset, p, dtype=object)` for that matter), but it doesn't...