Raphael Michel
Raphael Michel
Here's a patch for adding the system ID in the constructor: https://github.com/raphaelm/python-fints/pull/172
I can now finally reproduce this with my Sparkasse, but this PR doesn't fully fix it for me, digging deeper…
Okay, I can fix it for me with a further change I'll push after merge of this
I don't know. My Sparkasse has not rolled out the behavior yet, so I can't test any of this
I just had little time for this project, this actually looks good but I can't reopen the PR since your fork is deleted. Will try to apply manually.
That does not look like a valid product ID, could that be the issue?
While syntactically valid ZUGFeRD, it's not allowed by EN16931, so I'm not sure there's a practical use case for it? We could still add it, but I'm a little less...
First of all, sorry for the issues you had! Offline mode is manual because it involves a risk assessment by the user: By going offline, I am accepting the risk...
> Regarding your question of guidance: when would this migration fail? If understand the migration/AddConstraint in https://github.com/pretix/pretix/pull/3988 correctly, that migration would have already failed if an order-code/secret existed twice (over...
I don't think empty tags should be present in an invoice, as far as I understand, but I can't find the reference right now