Raphael Michel
Raphael Michel
I think we should handle the error better, not mess with the deletion. Deletion is important not to be forgotton for privacy reasons.
I'm not sure I thought it fully through, but as long as we believe it's situation the system will automatically will recover from, 409 sounds good to me
Likely same as #165, I can only help debugging once my Sparkasse rolled it out too
Please try again with python-fints 4.2.0 and storing the system ID and passing it to the next run: https://python-fints.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tans.html#system-ids If the issue persists, feel free to reopen.
I also found a small bug in the release that I fixed today with a new release, not sure if it's related
You're right. I'll merge it when I do the next release that has breaking changes. Would you have time looking at the now-failing tests?
> Are we aiming for full testing coverage on the PR? No, it's okay to apply some human thinking to where testing makes more sense or less sense. No need...
> I think, in this case, we treat the order in the same way as when it is not associated with a customer's account: allow access. It sounds like the...
Yeah, sounds good! Let's try if people break it in the real world :D
Can you share the raw file with us? As you're saying you're a pretix Hosted customer, you can also share it to [email protected] if you prefer