Radek Antoniuk

What you need is "Update relevant issues" action, but there is a known bug in it reported [JENKINS-62706](https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-62706).

@dependabot rebase

Hi @hinneLinks, Indeed, that might be caused by the fact that [the current implementation](https://github.com/jenkinsci/jira-plugin/pull/386/files#diff-656748ecf8755d89f32895845760d69b5913dafc0cd6981aecc655414f42d8deR446) is not taking into account [the noProxyHost](https://javadoc.jenkins.io/hudson/ProxyConfiguration.html#noProxyHost) setting. This should be fairly easy reproducible via a...

What do you see in the build logs?

Hi @stephaniemartin7, thanks for reporting the issue. The [DefaultIssueSelector](https://github.com/jenkinsci/jira-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/hudson/plugins/jira/selector/DefaultIssueSelector.java) collects all the issues from commit messages of the changelog of the current branch - not from the last successful build.

Currently the module expects full backend declarations without using the defaults for the "backends" definition. I think it [used to be better](https://github.com/terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-lb-http/tree/e8c089e9546462177919165e5980ba6541fb1aac) in the past, where only some of the...

That's indeed sad, having https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform/issues/22449 would be a step forward. Just out of curiosity, why was it [possible in the past](https://github.com/terraform-google-modules/terraform-google-lb-http/tree/e8c089e9546462177919165e5980ba6541fb1aac)? I can see the configuration data format was different...

Probably a problem with Jekyll version, see [here](https://github.com/mojombo/mojombo.github.io/issues/28#issuecomment-633992892)

Hi @jgutierrezglez, Just to confirm, are you using Jira Cloud? Does the "validate settings" button return OK? From the exception, I'm guessing it might be a bug caused [by this...

@bellingard are you ok for bumping this to current version?