David Drake

Hello @jfolli1 thanks for the report! I'm actually not running an Ubuntu box at this time. Any additional information you could provide on this such as the versions of the...

It doesn't purport to be better than humans.txt. It's different. Here's what I mentioned to someone else who asked a similar question: "This idea was partially inspired by the humans.txt...

@danekszy it doesn't claim to be performant or not add additional bloat, but I understand where you're coming from. HTTP headers are a very available, and generally accessible layer for...

@danekszy humans.txt is an additional file requiring an additional and specific HTTP request. It requires that file to be stored, hosted, and available in root of an existing site. I...

@aaronbassett I can understand what you're saying but this was never out to replace humans.txt, at all. It was meant to be a place for a few headers. That being...

@danekszy I can definitely understand the desire to not muck up the already bloated header space. The issue is I don't want to "try api.site.com/humans.txt". I don't want to have...

Stupid HTTP spec all getting in the way of improving the experience of developing things for the Internet. @danekszy I'm grateful for your time in expressing your opinion.

Thanks very much for the writeup. I like the direction that you are taking with this. Over in issue #1 we had a good discussion as to why it was...