Ramon Guiu

Thanks for the feedback @deaksmaestro. Today we leverage a retention policies in TimescaleDB which are set up using SQL which let's you dynamically change those. I understand your use case...

@niksajakovljevic @arajkumar should can we close this or do you think we should keep it and look into improving this? It's not clear to me what's the actual impact on...

We are aware of this limitation. We expected this would be an uncommon case. Does it happen often in your data? In which cases?

@zfy0701 could you share more details about the reason why you want to delete by time?

Seems #387 should be solved when we fix this

@paulfantom I'm not sure the issue you linked is related to this. That other issue seems to be about traces going through the OTel Collector and not being ingested why...

> what do you base this on? Mostly conversations we've had with Jaeger users and some folks in the tracing community. Do you disagree? Do you think the majority of...

Thanks for sharing your insights. I've rephrased the description. Let me know what we can do on our side to move this forward.

Quick update on this: 1. Implementation of the write path of remote API is in progress: https://github.com/timescale/promscale/issues/1535 2. We have planned the work on allowing to run the tests from...

@JosefPihrt so sorry I missed your mentions in this ticket. I would love to understand more about your use case. If you would be open to a discussion please drop...