raiph

> Are they all the same in the context of smart matching (`~~`) ? Yes, except that you can only specify matching adverbs using the `m...` variant. > This language...

Aiui we want to *avoid* nailing anything down in roast unless we are *very* confident we *want* to do that for any given "feature" / test. ---- As for the...

> I’m increasingly wondering whether `:ignoremark` is a good idea at all. Have you explored its discussion over the years? A couple obvious places to look are [a google for...

Hi @coke, I'd like to "take" this ticket as the "driver" and see how I do. If there's some particular thing I'm supposed to do to "take" this ticket other...

Hi @JJ, Thanks for feedback. :) `AT-KEY` is absolutely a magic method, as are `BUILD` and cousins (well, that strays into method or submethod of course), and even methods like...

> If 'comment' is substituted for 'pod' in the above, there is no error. Huh?

Hi @Kaiepi Is `self.bind: -> \ { m }` missing something after the `\` or is it pseudo-code? (Is that what you meant by "wishy-washy"?) Have you looked at what...

"deleted" (because this comment was unhelpful)

"deleted" (because this comment was unkind) Sorry 2colours.

> "Not coercive, so fails on differing types." Thus no casts here. > But up to my understanding, the comment is about `Real` casting ... The code comment may well...