Mateusz Szafoni

@zouboan could you prepare a PR anyway ? It will be easier to get feedback from the community that way.

Can we use rwlock_t from https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/10776 to solve this issue ? atomic_int is C11 feature I think, so probably it won't be available on all supported platforms. I was testing...

I came back to this problem. Why not just add critical section like suggested before (only in this specific place): ``` C flags = enter_critical_section(); //

I'm reopening this issue as it is not fully resolved yet

I don't have any NXP board so I can't confirm if the problem has been fixed (it has to be tested on HW). Let someone who works with NXP confirm...

The ability to run NuttX on low cost chips would be a very cool feature, but if we're thinking about PSE51, then supporting the rest of POSIX RT profiles would...

@acassis Dividing examples into categories is a very good idea, but it doesn't solve the problem of this issue. Where `examples/foc` should go, it demonstrate various OS components: FOC driver,...

Hi, almost no progress. I bought a handful of mrf24j40 modules (supported in NuttX) and put them in a pile on my desk with the rest of the devkits waiting...

This issue is about IEEE802.15.4 support for nRF5x using the build-in radio. The only purpose why I need mrf24j40 is for testing and a better understanding of how MAC layer...

Here's the draft PR : https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11617 There's still a lot of work and testing to do. I'll come back to this probably next weekend.