Raff Viglianti

Maybe this is for a different ticket, but what do you mean by grouping editorial interventions? If it's akin to the example above, then choice/orig/reg is the obvious solution, no...

I would group them with choice/orig/reg. `` is an editorial description of missing content (so not an intervention, per se), while `` makes sense on its own, but in this...

I think that's worth it; so that we get to keep the definition of choice and subst well distinguished between editor and scribe. But we probably need to hear from...

Great! Yes, their extension is starting to cover a lot of ground without needing Java. My understanding is that what you described is the expected behavior for xinclude: the included...

I mean that users would have to modify the schema and add elements to .

HI @tillgrallert, thanks for reporting this! The next release will have a configuration file, so I'll experiment with adding an option for this. The extension uses a SAX approach for...

Hello @oscarlevin and @StevenClontz thanks for reaching out! I would be happy to talk more, I could drop in for the Friday meeting if that helps (I can join at...

I agree. I usually prefer to place this type of warning at the top rather than the footer, though. See https://scholarlyediting.org/se.index.issues.html

It's also unlikely that CSS content will be considered by search engines. Perhaps it doesn't matter, but adding an HTML banner to the existing content would address this

F2F subgroup likes this idea a lot. We discussed a couple strategies for implementation, which is not as straight forward as one might think. * Create a persistent structured file...