Randy Döring

@johnthagen What do you think about a `pinned` extra as prototyped in #9428?

> Would pipx be able to upgrade to the next locked release? I would think so? I did not test it but I would think so, too. > My idea...

> I also wonder if we do go this route, perhaps the frequency of bug fix releases could be increased and along with those, new locked dependencies? I would even...

I can only speak for `poetry` with absolute certainty which creates an environment independent lockfile. It's been a while since I used `pipenv` but as far as I know, it...

> What's the status of this PR? It is ready for review.

> If there's no objections, will finish adding tests, etc. I think, we are open for this setting. Please also create a downstream (draft) PR that shows the usage of...

In general, our stance is that `poetry-core` (as a build backend) should not have any dependencies. Since `typing-extensions` is a small package we might think about vendoring it. However, I'm...

Interesting approach. I'll try to take a closer look later this week. For future reference: #552 is a previous attempt to solve the issue by just making `platform_release` "non-version-like". The...

I added a few more tests, fixed and simplified a few things. I think I will take another look next week and - if everything still makes sense to me...

`tool.poetry.extras` is deprecated so that bugs concerning `optional` are quite low priority. In my opinion, relative path dependencies are only for development or projects which are not built but deployed...