Radek Pietruszewski

> If I tidied up this PR, gating this behavior behind a default-false flag (as per my draft), would it be something you'd consider merging? Yes, if it's not the...

> Alternatively we could choose to remove fast-async, I would consider this. While I love the fast-async project, unfortunately it's not super popular, and the complexity of Watermelon's babel config...

Not at this time, but this seems like an easy improvement - PRs are welcome

Can you be more specific? I understand you're frustrated, but please give more details under which conditions does an unexpected reset occur.

@enahum I don't know if this PR will do it, but once 0.73 is done, 0.74+/new arch is next

@nmeibergen Can you go through comments in previous PR? There were some unresolved issues that were waiting for corrections before I could merge. As for bumping to fts5… I'm not...

@nmeibergen hey, are you interested in finishing that?

@nmeibergen hey, are you maybe still interested in finishing this? ;)

No worries, thanks for the update!

It is a goal, yes -- unfortunately I haven't had the funding (or free time) to work on it :( And while many contributors did amazing job pushing the branch...