István Gansperger

Results 11 comments of István Gansperger

I'm not sure whether adding a non HTML encoded string hole is a good idea but you can do this with the current templating: ``` html ``` ``` fsharp myScript=[Doc.Verbatim...

I'm not familiar enough with the internals of shapeless to know why this would cause an issue in a case class. The only workaround I found so far is to...

Hey. I myself have an L750 too and I have finally managed to solve the brightness issue. http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=11543948&postcount=40 Take a look at this reference which doesn't exactly match your laptop...

lspci -nn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family DRAM Controller [8086:0104](rev 09) 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200/2nd Generation Core Processor Family PCI...

This issue breaks context propagation in Play applications when using filters, since filters use `Promise`: https://github.com/playframework/playframework/blob/d1f1b9f8cd8d564933381967b4e623b8842c2377/core/play/src/main/scala/play/api/mvc/Filters.scala#L62 Using the following config seems to work as a workaround for Play filters (taken...

Interestingly the [`addDebugger` syntax from bash-template](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/blob/4ce488721a1c6864795f682449e03050195047b8/src/main/resources/com/typesafe/sbt/packager/archetypes/scripts/bash-template#L157) is only compatible with Java 9+, but the GH workflow is still pulling JDK 1.8. [java_version_check](https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/blob/4ce488721a1c6864795f682449e03050195047b8/src/main/resources/com/typesafe/sbt/packager/archetypes/scripts/bash-template#L287) also checks for Java 8, not 9. Not...

I've been a bit busy and wasn't sure what to do about Java 8 compat, but I ended up adding some checks so that `-jvm-debug` works on both `ash` and...

Sounds good, but this would be a breaking change then: > `-jvm-debug 5005` - listen on all addresses (Java 8) or only localhost (Java 9+) This currently means `*:5005` on...

I've reverted https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/pull/1546 and removed the major version checks. Note that this would be a breaking change for anyone currently using `-jvm-debug 5005` on JDK 9+. They would have to...

> that this is only used in testing environments and not in production, right? Yeah, I think that nobody _should_ be using this flag in production. (Unfortunately that doesn't necessarily...