Jer Miller

I'm trying to get the Velleman KA04 shield working with a [pinoccio scout](https://pinocc.io) and pretty sure I have everything hooked up right, but am stuck. The [pin defines](https://github.com/Pinoccio/core-pinoccio/blob/master/avr/variants/pinoccio/pins_arduino.h) should all...

COSE definition for proof support

6

Similar to adapting JWP for JOSE by creating a new top-level type, COSE will also need the same treatment. COSE currently has three major types for Sign, Encrypt, and Mac,...

Support for multiple signatures/proofs

14

H/T @OR13 on looping me into a thread about the difficulty (complete lack-of) of supporting multiple signatures in JWTs, this is definitely a use case we should try to directly...

Having worked on the SU and MAC algo drafts which both make use of proof values that are actually arrays, I would like to update the JPT core definition to...

I'd like to add another presentation form with five sections: `..~..` Right now, the SU/MAC algs incorporate the presentation signature into the proof and it doesn't feel right. The holder...

This is tracking items to be done on the main JWP draft before being published as an IETF ID - [ ] Decide on example (BBS vs. SU) - [...

VC Data Model Example

3

Placeholder to track adding a full example of a JPT using the VC Data Model into the draft.

Document known algorithm features & predicate proof support

3

* range proof * equivalence * blind signatures * PoK * set (non-)membership etc...

There's a distinction between knowing how to disclose a claim as a mechanical process and full understanding the semantics of a claim

3

Per the discussion on the 2-Nov-21 DIF JWP call, we need clearer language than "understood". _Originally posted by @selfissued in https://github.com/json-web-proofs/json-web-proofs/pull/16#discussion_r741375561_