Quentin Lambert

On a related subject, shouldn't there be a parametric restriction on the constructor call/binding equation.

@HansOlsson On the one hand, I understand that this use of hierarchical connector may not have been the intended use case. On the other hand wanting to simplify the interface...

I don't understand the wording. Can you explain what your text is trying to do that specifying that potentially present component are considered declared does not?

I prefer this alternative but I don't understand the purpose of `3.`. There are no potentially present connector then, since `1.` made them into declared component. To me `3.` sounds...

> size(A) (including size(A, j) where j is parameter expression) if A is variable declared in a non-function class. I think this says implicitly that within the context of a...

What bothers me about the example is that `{1, 2, 3}` has the correct number of dimensions for `a` in the first place. Therefore, it is applied to each element...

I agree, but first we need to agree on what is allowed.

Ok, does this also apply to the three other models I gave?

Can you share your reasoning for the three models being illegal. The values given in the modifier can be used as argument of a carefully constructed call to `fill` which...

> However, for more complicated modifiers that is not always possible. I don't see that can you provide an example? or an idea of why it wouldn't be possible? Are...