Enrique Llorente Pastora

> @qinqon I tried to bump the kubevirtci version with `hack/bump-kubevirtci.sh` however the `fedora-test-tooling` doesn't contain the sg3 utils added by [kubevirt/kubevirtci#842](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/842). Have you already built a kubevirtci with that...

> > > @qinqon I tried to bump the kubevirtci version with `hack/bump-kubevirtci.sh` however the `fedora-test-tooling` doesn't contain the sg3 utils added by [kubevirt/kubevirtci#842](https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirtci/pull/842). Have you already built a kubevirtci...

/ok-to-test

> We have that already https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/blob/main/deploy/operator/role.yaml#L28-L34

@creydr could this be related to something missing at the openshift fork ?

> Should not be related to the openshift fork, as the manifests from upstreams are used Maybe the SCC upstream is missing something ?

/test pull-kubernetes-nmstate-e2e-handler-k8s-future

/lgtm /approve

Maybe we can implement a new `NodeNetworkConfigurationbTemplate` that has some capture placeholders and then have a `desiredStateFromTemplate` at NNCP to reference it, then the NNCP will fill in the placeholders...

Also note that we are working in a host ip pool proposal that may be of help for you: - https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/pull/1088