pwschuurman

Hi @ruheenaansari34, #3336 has been merged.

/sig apps

/remove-sig multicluster

* Docs draft PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/37224

Hi @ruheenaansari34 @rhockenbury, this is currently marked as tracked by sig-multicluster, but the KEP is in sig-apps. Can the enhancements spreadsheet be updated to reflect the current state of this...

> Hi there @pwschuurman wave 1.26 Docs Shadow here. > > This enhancement is marked as ‘Needs Docs’ for 1.26 release. I see you've opened [kubernetes/website#37224](https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/37224). I'd like to confirm...

Hi @parul5sahoo, yes this is the only k/k PR. There arare two other PRs, one for documentation and one for the blog post. Working on getting the k/k PR submitted...

Hi @rhockenbury I just filed for an exception request: https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-sig-apps/c/SqUMOWxwwpo This exception is just pending on a single PR (https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/112744), which has been signed off by sig-apps and is just...

@saikat-royc Can we change the controller to not put the driver in the backoff condition if the error isn't a "rate limit exceeded" from GCE API? From what I recall,...

> We also want to backoff if the detach fails due to the node not existing or something like that, right? @mattcary Is this just to preemptively get ahead of...