pwschuurman

> Another possible user story: I want to use [kubefed](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubefed) to schedule a StatefulSet to multiple clusters, but doing so would result in a StatefulSet of [0, n) to be...

> Is there the future compatibility for disjoint slices with the same name? > > The use case is like this: Initially, we schedule `foo` to cluster A with 5...

@JeremyOT @pmorie for sig-multicluster visibility

The goal of this KEP from the use cases described is to isolate slices of replicas across two StatefulSets. For an application orchestrator to migrate replicas, it can scale down...

> Re: alternates considered, let's make sure to list the alternate designs and describe the key arguments for each. I'll add a few if you miss any. Thanks. I captured...

> I'm fine with the KEP from a technical pov from sig-apps side, but you need to update the metadata so that it matches reality (approvers, reviewers, owning sig, participating...

> although the verify failures is to be fixed Thanks @soltysh, updated the README.md TOC.

@mattcary Yes, this allows for https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/gcp-compute-persistent-disk-csi-driver/commit/46d7e4a01433ff2967cfae64fcbb7b23974bb868 to be tested in our presubmit

LGTM

/sig multicluster