Christian Poveda Ruiz
Christian Poveda Ruiz
> So it looks reasonable, but it's fairly unfortunate that we can't handle neither `[[noreturn]]` nor `__attribute__((noreturn))` which I think are more common ways to deal with this. I can...
Weird, both test that failed pass on local (but I have a pretty recent clang version so that might be it). I'll try to bring back the UnexposedAttribute logic to...
Fixed :tada:
@emilio now this supports all 3 options :)
both headers pass the layout tests in my machine. Could I be missing something @fitzgen?
I'm not sure If `bindgen` can properly support this. One thing that comes to mind would be monomorphizing everything under different names so that ```c template class test{}; template class...
This became an instance of #1538 if I understand.
> Anyway, should I write an issue describing this? I think this would be better because as far as I understand this issue only is about wrapping bodies of `unsafe`...
@MeFisto94 I think 1 is hard as generating c code is not something bindgen can do right now. About 2 I think a sensible idea would be defining a bunch...
As of today, Rust does not support variadic functions unless they are `extern`, free ones. I've been thinking about different ways to solve this, each one of them with their...