Steve Purcell

Isn't this because the hook variable name produced by the `define-minor-mode` form is `haskell-error-mode-hook`, without a trailing `s`?

Oh, sorry if I got confused. But in any case, the expanded definition of `haskell-error-mode` includes code to run that hook, so I'd like to understand why that didn't seem...

This may be technically possible, but it seems like an indirect way to solve what is presumably an underlying issue with the LSP backend not completing very usefully inside comments.

You could be right, but on the other hand I'd be extremely surprised if the backend for `lsp-java` doesn't intelligently complete javadoc comment tags like `@property`, which I think would...

I'm inclined to agree that your expected result might be nicer, but I don't think the goal of the indentation code was to allow customisation of the resulting style, rather...

Yes, you might be right. I don't use folding, and can't comment on what the ideal behaviour would be. I'd imagine keeping one blank line between the folded items might...

Thanks. What do you mean by "previous versions"? I don't think there has been an "inf-haskell-mode" for at least 3 years.

The docs for `C-h f haskell-mode` don't seem *too* terrible: > Additional Haskell mode modules can be hooked in via ‘haskell-mode-hook’. > ... > Interaction modes: > > ‘interactive-haskell-mode’ >...

One approach to this might be to support a project-local config file like `.lorrirc`, and allow the user to specify hook commands in there, which would simply be shell commands...

I haven't used ritz before. Does it help if you then evaluate (with `M-:`) this expression: ``` lisp (ac-nrepl-setup) ``` ?