Wojtek Pudelko

Hi @coatless, Thanks for the great feedback and initial remarks! I've implemented the requested changes: > The only issue is the lack of short walk through from data ingestion to...

Hi @coatless, Hope you're well! I’m just touching base on the review of the software package. I totally understand how things can get busy—just keen to know how it’s going...

Hi all! 👋 That's great news, and thank you @crhea93, @jsdodge, and @eigenbrot for joining! I'm excited to see the ball rolling and look forward to working with you on...

Hi @crhea93, I see that the reviews are coming in, and I wanted to check what the next steps are. Is it okay for me to start working on them,...

Hi all! 👋 Once again, thank you very much for your time, as well as for your valuable and positive reviews! Over the past few weeks, I’ve been working through...

Hi all 👋 Just a quick update — I’ve increased the test coverage to 81%, and the package is now officially ready for the second round of review. 🚀 I’m...

Thanks again for the detailed remarks, @eigenbrot, and for pointing out the outdated parts of the documentation! As before, here’s my point-by-point response and I'm looking forward to your feedback!...

Thanks a lot @eigenbrot for your prompt response! Answering two of your comments: * Since it's just this one problematic function, I decided to comment it out for now —...

Hi All, Just wanted to kindly check in and ask about the next steps in the review process — hoping the submission doesn’t fall off our radar :) Please let...