Piotr Sarna

No such thing is available at the moment. Some materialized views are synchronous though. E.g. views which have an identical partition key definition as the base table will also be...

Hello and Happy New Year! (pardon us for the delay, everybody was celebrating) The only reasons are performance and ease of development - if we assume the layout to have...

@krzysztofgal I think our API is a little inconsistent here. What will most likely work for you (please try) is calling `set_timestamp()` directly on `self.batch`, not on individual statements. Based...

Oh wait, if you need multiple timestamp values inside a batch statement, then I think that CQL does not really allow expressing it without using `USING TIMESTAMP` in each query....

This issue is currently in a "pull requests welcome" state. It's generally on a roadmap, but the team is currently focused on providing performance benchmarks.

If we decide to implement FromCqlVal for MaybeUnset, we also need to decide what's the semantics of its serialization and deserialization. Unset is a specific thing, because you'll never really...

Yup, tagging specific values as serializable to `Unset` sounds much better, I don't really like the idea of making MaybeUnset pseudo-deserializable.

although we probably need to name it something like `serialize_null_as_unset`, to emphasize that regular values are still serialized as values.

note to myself: the most important thing to remember is that I commented-out support for loading extensions for simplicity, and we definitely need to bring it back, it's a vital...

one more self note: dump/exporter.rs had some logic based on rusqlite's savepoint API. We don't have it yet, so for now we'd have to handcode it, so that the transaction...