probonopd

Getting `/usr/include/c++/5/bits/move.h:185: error: undefined reference to 'qtLibfix` - did I break it? Sorry!

Thanks @SuperJMN. Please fix the desktop file: ``` /tmp/.mount_runtimHOadPH/App.desktop: error: file contains line "0.1.81", which is not a comment, a group or an entry /tmp/.mount_runtimHOadPH/App.desktop: error: value "$APPDIR/AvaloniaSyncer/AvaloniaSyncer.Desktop" for key...

Thanks @SuperJMN. Possibly the rest is running into a Firejail-related issue here: ``` Error src/firejail/appimage.c:194 appimage_mount(): mounting appimage: Invalid argument ``` Unfortunately, I don't know what is causing this or...

How about printing at least a very clear message including a link to the documentation, and requiring explicit confirmation ("press Y to continue anyway")? In think that this issue needs...

I suggested interactivity so that it will _not_ be used in CI scripts ("see linuxdeployqt's lengthy CLI option to ignore that one check"). > The real solution to this is...

So far, we've been guilty of "Engineering based on hope". So in the AppImage spec, I think we should put in "MUST run at least on (some definition)".

How can we entirely prevent situations like [this](https://github.com/AppImage/appimage.github.io/pull/2967)?

Thanks for sharing your detailed thoughts @TheAssassin. Many good points. While I have read everything I can't respond to every sentence, but I'd like to address the main considerations. >...

...and again: Someone went through all the effort of making an AppImage https://github.com/fougue/mayo/issues/26 only for it to fail the test https://github.com/AppImage/appimage.github.io/pull/2983 and eating up my time explaining https://github.com/fougue/mayo/issues/26#issuecomment-1242692360 I have...

Maybe something like we do in linuxdeployqt is a reasonable tradeoff. Users seem to understand it. * https://github.com/probonopd/linuxdeployqt/issues/549#issuecomment-1238141311