PyoungRyang Ko

>I think parsing schelp via regex will not work as regex is not able to capture surroundings and encapsulations properly? In some cases, parsing via regex will not work. However,...

There are some issues when converting md to SCDoc. --- * Heading levels A problem is converting md heading levels to SCDoc. https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/ md supports 6 heading levels, while SCDoc...

@JordanHendersonMusic >Could you explain why this is necessary here rather than linking to a post? I added the explanation in the PR. --- >Why can't someone just write `a.insert(i.clip(0, a.size),...

> I think the name is wrong. > > The clipped prefix, as in `clippedPut` clips the index, not the container size. Do you mean the `.clipPut` method? https://doc.sccode.org/Overviews/Methods.html#clipPut In...

@JordanHendersonMusic Adding this method to `RingBuffer`would not be a problem. Changing the method name for `ArrayedCollection` and `List` to `clipInsertMaintainSize` is OK for me. I do not want this long...

OK, then I do not change `RingBuffer`. How about `insertKeepSize` instead of `clipInsertKeepSize `?

> Perhaps `clipInsertKeepSize` is better, follows on from `keep`. Done! But `keep` is a method of `SequenceableCollection` whiliest`clipInsertKeepSize` is for `ArrayedCollection` and `List`. So it could not follow on from...

Would it be OK if I implemented the `insertKeepSize` method on this PR? I think I would use `insertKeepSize` more than `clipInsertKeppSize`.

added `insertKeepSize`.

Is there anything that needs correcting? Could this PR be approved and merged before the 3.14 release?