Pete R Jemian
Pete R Jemian
Y'all speakin Southern a'gin? Yet I agree.
*Mechanism 2: a modal plan-only mode* is not bad but is the weakest of these three. Too easy for users to forget which mode and thus introduce unexpected behavior. Most...
(1) for sure. It could enable fulfillment of a request to list all known plans. On Fri, Aug 9, 2019, 6:11 PM Teddy Rendahl wrote: > Fine with having them...
Different decorator for subs that need help to run as plan? On Sat, Aug 10, 2019, 10:57 AM Dan Allan wrote: > That is worth some thought. But wouldn’t there...
On 2019-08-14 1:27 PM, Dan Allan wrote: > In the wild, many beamlines are making functions that call |RE| Seen while on safari at APS, as well. Convenience vs. elegance....
* Definite downvote on 2 (modal plan-only mode) - there will be unintended behavior whether or not PS1 is changed - people are blind * OK using some character (such...
And a default setting for the user-supplied format string if it raises an exception.
What version of hklpy? On Fri, Jul 15, 2022, 6:31 PM Andi Barbour ***@***.***> wrote: > Quick fix, use all three miller indices: > RE(scan(detector_list, diffract.h, hh, hh, diffract.k, kk,...
User replied (by private email): > Yeah, if it is 'divided by zero' kind of thing, I probably wouldn't look at it twice. I at first thought I setup things...
Well of course that error comes from numpy, it's just doing what was asked. This PR exists because the scientific user wasted time looking in how knows where before even...