Konrad Weihmann

Also here I have to veto against merging it. The exception inside of the rule loading method has to be safe so users can run the tool even when a...

Well yes we could do that. I set it up like this out of the following reasons - one common interface (pytest) - one common configuration file (setup.cfg) - same...

I did some experiments with that "back in the days", but yeah I fear it might be a bit too big... especially as this ordering is highly configurable with the...

I was further thinking about this and realized that this would get really messy (to get all the needed dependencies, a.s.o.), so the value of the integration is very low...

@BrandonStaab anything I can do to get this merged?

@all is there anything I can do to get this here merged?

Soon this PR will have its first anniversary - is there the slightest chance of getting it at least merged - I mean to me this is a critical bug,...

> 2 years passed, looks we have to carry this manually with ourselves. Maybe time to drop this PR to increase the pressure :imp: :grin:

@barcharcraz, as the other former maintainers are not responding to the merge this code change here, would you be willing to unblock the compilation for anyone with having gcc 10+?

 That is how it looks like