calculix-adapter icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
calculix-adapter copied to clipboard

preCICE-adapter for the CSM code CalculiX

Results 23 calculix-adapter issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

(Depends on #105 ) Fixes https://github.com/precice/calculix-adapter/issues/9. Essentially, checkpointing stores more data than previously (not only positions, but velocities and a few more things), because those additional fields must be stored...

For implicit coupling the writeCheckpoint is called by the function: `Precice_WriteIterationCheckPoint` This function takes the values of the last timestep as checkpoint values. However, for implicit coupled simulations where the...

To keep clean releases, I thought it might be wise to document somewhere how to maintain everything. In particular, explain how to upgrade to a new CCX version with detailed...

For temperature and heat flux, we are checking whether the field name is exactly matched in the config: https://github.com/precice/calculix-adapter/blob/4496e8f160ec121481653baf44ec032813409ac6/adapter/PreciceInterface.c#L624 For other fields, we are checking whether the field name just...

bug

I have found that CalculiX contains an error in dynamic mode on restart where the restarted results will not match identically to a non-restarted run. This is fundamentally a CalculiX...

bug

For the OpenFOAM adapter we decided to have one adapter configuration file per participant, [as shown here](https://github.com/precice/tutorials/blob/master/CHT/heat_exchanger/buoyantSimpleFoam-CalculiX/Inner-Fluid/precice-adapter-config.yml). This was done so that we don't need to modify the solver to...

enhancement

As of now, PaStiX is supported in a different Makefile. In the long run, we'd like to make it such that a unique Makefile (more maintainable ?) with a unique...

enhancement

We currently have the quick-and-dirty solution for GCC 10 or newer: ``` FFLAGS = -Wall -O3 -fopenmp $(INCLUDES) # Note for GCC 10 or newer: add -fallow-argument-mismatch in the above...

enhancement

fix #8 A small hack to make DisplacementDeltas work for explicit coupling as well. My question however is, is DisplacementDeltas change in displacement within a sub-cycle or change in displacement...

Goal: inline in the actual ccx code using `#ifdef`s **Note:** I copied this issue from our internal list of todos to make it more visible. Please feel free to directly...