Pavel Raiskup
Pavel Raiskup
Agreed, we should merge once these are available - the preference is to not confuse users with non-working configs.
See also the older #1383
But are acutally other containers working, without `backend-log` consuming the redis log messages?
This would be OK after moving to F40 builders where zig-srpm-macros package exists; but on our builders, %zig_arches is undefined.
> If this is a different issue, I can open a new ticket. Not sure. ix86 => 32bit only. Is that #3061 or #3114?
``` Running SRPMResults tool Package info: { "name": "zls", "epoch": null, "version": "0.11.0", "release": "1", "exclusivearch": [ "%{zig_arches}" ], "excludearch": [] } ``` One of the workarounds that we discussed...
After the team meeting.. Would you mind using a command-line client (or python3-copr API)? The `copr-cli monitor` feature would probably work relatively effectively for your use-case. And we are almost...
This is a very interesting idea, thank you.
@brianjmurrell what is happening for gems and python is that anytia reports us that a "**python** package Foo gets update with version Bar". When such message is delivered to Copr,...
> It seems I can add a COPR mapping and map it to my Copr user/project. So what actually happens in Copr as result of that? This is interesting. I...