Pavel Raiskup
Pavel Raiskup
Not yet, the ETA plan for the release is next Thursday (if everything goes OK). Is that OK, or do you want us to hot-fix this in production?
Oh, yes - I meant "next week Thursday" rather than "this week Thursday". But I can try to hotfix tomorrow, seems pretty easy to rollback if problems appear at least.
I applied the patch now, I am sorry it took several days... got quite busy elsewhere.
Thank you for the report. I'm locked in a meeting room, but this seems like a different issue, not sure if related: #3443.
@lsm5 I'm unsure how/when Packit re-creates the projects; perhaps some people from Packit reacted. Anyway, the remaining typo triggering 500 was fixed in #3443. I haven't seen this problem since...
> We already allow custom HTML for project descriptions, so this shouldn't be expensive to implement. 👍
This would bring security issue into the `src.fedoraproject.org` integration (the pagure events handler).... a single Copr project may integrate multiple packages from s.f.o. being developed by multiple packagers from s.f.o,...
Addded to copr. Somewhat related https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1557
Only a nit; there are no "Fixes: " labels in git commit messages; but this certainly has some issue counterparts.
Copy-pasting from #2631: Ken Dreyer commented at 2018-05-18 20:12:07: Description of problem: It is easy to accidentally forget to click "Webhook rebuild" when setting up a new Copr. Version-Release number...