Szymon Tomasz Stefanek
Szymon Tomasz Stefanek
Certificate updated. SSL apache configuration updated. @RogueScholar: Please take a look, if you can.
It seems that SIGPIPE is already ignored... But there may be some threading issues here as it's unclear if signal management is thread-wide or process-wide. We should probably just ignore...
Can you try branch ignore-sigpipe to see if it changes anything?
A man page is not very visible. Better a markup that can be placed on github and maybe processed into html to be placed on the site.
Well, if it fixes the problem and doesn't break tests then it looks good. However, I don't understand the relation between the #ifdef __cplusplus define and the #ifdef MAX one....
Though I still don't understand why. In theory the behaviour of an #ifdef should not be influenced by any previous #ifdef... ... it seems to be more of a bug...
While I agree that this is a different usage of a namespace, and it is certainly a reference, and the code looks perfectly fine, I'm not 100% positive with using...
> ``` > using std::cout; > ``` > > Ideally, `std` should be tagged, too: Not sure... Well, technically it could be a solution, but it's quite a convoluted one....
> ``` > namespace X { > using A::B; > } > ``` > > With changes, I proposed in this pull request, `B` is tagged as a reference tag...
> About `B` you show two ideas: > > [...] Yes, both solutions can work. Your call. > About `nameref`, I don't convince I understand your idea or not. Ignore...